ProceduresGovernment

Workers in Farming Activities

Group (61) - 2025-Q1

  • 3.42M, Workforce
  • $3.09k MX, Average monthly salary
  • 37.3, Weekly hours worked
  • 5.46, Weekly days worked
  • 9.97%, Workforce with second job

About Workers in Farming Activities

#permalink to section

The workforce of Workers in Farming Activities during first quarter of 2025 was 3.42M people, whose salary averaged $3.09k MX working around 37.3 hours per week.

Workforce and Salaries Evolution

#permalink to section

  • 3.42M, Workforce 2025-Q1
  • $3.09k MX, Average monthly salary 2025-Q1

At first quarter of 2025, the people who worked as Workers in Farming Activities were 3.42M being a 2.42% lower than the fourth quarter of 2024. (3.51M).

In the same period, an average salary of $3.09k MX was observed, registering an increase of 6.3%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 ($2.91k MX).

Workforce by State

#permalink to section

Comparing the first quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2025, the main positive variations occurred in Estado de México and Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave with an increase of 43.7k (23.2%) and 35.4k (8.81%), respectively. On the other hand, the negative variations were accentuated in Guerrero and Jalisco with a decrease of 53.7k (19.7%) and 41.9k (23.4%), respectively.

Salaries by State

#permalink to section

The states with the best average salaries for Workers in Farming Activities during first quarter of 2025 were Baja California Sur ($8.89k MX), Sonora ($7.87k MX), and Baja California ($7.35k MX)

Comparing the first quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2025, the positive salary growth was higher in Aguascalientes and Tabasco with an increase of $1.73k MX (61.5%) and $1.41k MX (41.6%), respectively. Por otro lado, las variaciones salariales negativas se acentuaron en Chihuahua and Quintana Roo with a decrease of $1.38k MX (27.4%) and $1.28k MX (43.5%), respectively.

Average Salary and Workforce by Gender and Schooling Years

#permalink to section

* The data regarding salaries have low statistical precision so it should not be used as conclusions.