Manufacturing
Sector (31-33)
2024-Q4: $6.79T MX, Gross Domestic Product
Jan-Dec 2024: US$19.9B, Foreign Direct Investment
2024-Q3 : $3.6k MX, Average Monthly Salary
2024-Q3 : 20.4k, Workforce
In the fourth quarter of 2024 the gross domestic product was $6.79T MX, N/A% N/A the previous quarter.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, total gross production was $10.8T MX. The states with the highest total gross production were Nuevo León ($1.33T MX) and Estado de México ($1.18T MX).
For its part, total income reached $11.1T MX in 2019, being the states with the highest income Nuevo León ($1.35T MX) and Estado de México ($1.22T MX).
Economic activities are related if they require similar knowledge or inputs. In 2014 in Manufacturing the states with the highest affinity were Baja California Sur (0.8), San Luis Potosí (0.72), Sinaloa (0.72), Zacatecas (0.72), and Durango (0.66).
During the third quarter of 2024 in Manufacturing the workforce was 20.4k people, N/A% men and N/A% women. In addition, the average monthly salary informed was $3.6k MX.
During the same period, occupations with the highest number of workers in Manufacturing were Other Industrial Machinery Operators, Assemblers and Transport Drivers, not elsewhere Classified, Technical Maintenance and Repair of Machinery and Industrial Instruments, and Supervisors of Industrial Machinery Operators.
At the state level, the occupied population of Manufacturing was concentrated in List San Luis Potosí,Sonora,Nuevo León.
Production
#permalink to sectionGross Domestic Product
#permalink to sectionGross domestic product 2024-Q4: $6.79T MX
Gross Domestic Product 2024: $6.66T MX
In the fourth quarter of 2024, Manufacturing recorded a gross domestic product of $6.79T MX, evidencing N/A of N/A% compared to the previous quarter and N/A of N/A% compared to the same period of the previous year.
* Current values, at current prices, base year 2013. Excludes taxes on products.
Production Indicators by State
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the Economic Census 2019, 579,828 economic units were totaled in Manufacturing, highlighting Estado de México (61,840), Oaxaca (52,023), and Puebla (50,091).
Total gross production was $10.8T MX. The states with the highest total gross production were Nuevo León ($1.33T MX) and Estado de México ($1.18T MX).
Total income reached $11.1T MX in 2019, being the states with the highest income Nuevo León ($1.35T MX) and Estado de México ($1.22T MX).
* It is recommended to consider the values as approximations of the real value because some records have been anonymized due to confidentiality principles.
Production Indicators by Municipality
#permalink to sectionIn 2019, Manufacturing had a total of 579,828 economic units and the municipalities with the highest number of economic units were León (10.9k), Guadalajara (8.01k), and Iztapalapa (7.39k).
Also, $11.1T MX in total income were registered and the municipalities with the highest income were Toluca ($335B MX), Ramos Arizpe ($304B MX), and Saltillo ($296B MX).
Total expenditure registered in 2019 was $8.05T MX and the municipalities with the highest expenditure were Ramos Arizpe ($241B MX), Toluca ($239B MX), and Silao de la Victoria ($232B MX).
In 2019 there were 5.33M employees dependent on economic units and the municipalities with the highest number of employees were Juárez (304k), Tijuana (251k), and León (144k).
* Any inconsistency between the data at the state and municipal level is due to the anonymization methodologies applied to the data, also municipalities not shown in the visualization have been anonymized.
Economic Units
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the number of economic units in Manufacturing according to the number of employees.
According to DENUE data published in N/A, N/A companies with 0 to 10 employees were registered (equal number of companies as the previous period). In the same period, N/A companies with 11 to 50 employees were registered (equal number of companies as the previous period).
N/A companies with 51 to 100 employees were registered in N/A (equal number of companies as the previous period). Likewise, N/A companies with more than 101 employees were registered (equal number of companies as the previous period).
Source National Statistical Directory of Economic Units (DENUE)
Investment
#permalink to sectionForeign Direct Investment (FDI)
#permalink to section- US$19.9B, FDI Jan-Dec 2024
- US$375B, FDI Jan-1999 to Dec-2024
In the period January to December 2024, FDI from Manufacturing was US$19.9B, distributed in reinvestment of earnings (US$15.4B), inter-company debts (US$3.86B), and equity Capital (US$607M).
Since January 1999 to December 2024, the accumulated amount of FDI in Manufacturing was US$375B, distributed in equity Capital (US$136B), reinvestment of earnings (US$134B), and inter-company debts (US$105B).
* Confidential data is not shown in the chart (see information icon in the section).
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) by State
#permalink to sectionPeriod Jan-Dec 2024: US$0
Period Jan-1999 to Dec-2024: US$54.1B, Mexico City is the main receiving state
No FDI is recorded in the period January to December, 2024
Historically (from January 1999 to December2024) the states that have received the highest FDI are Mexico City (US$54.1B), Nuevo León (US$50.7B), and Estado de México (US$38.7B).
* Information download does not contain confidential data.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Origin
#permalink to sectionPeriodo Jan-Dec 2024: ---, US$0
Main investing country between Jan-1999 and Dec-2024: United States, US$164B
No FDI is recorded in the period January to December of 2024.
Historically (from January 1999 to December de 2024) the countries that contributed the most to FDI were United States (US$4.3B), Japan (US$4.05B), and Germany (US$3.39B).
* Information download does not contain confidential data.
Specialization and Opportunity
#permalink to sectionAs of May 2021, the states with the highest degree of specialization in Manufacturing were Oaxaca (1.94), Yucatán (1.91), and Guerrero (1.79). The degree of specialization is measured using the RCA index, which represents the ratio between the observed and expected establishments of each state for each industry.
The states with the highest degree of development opportunity in Manufacturing according to Relatedness were Baja California Sur (0.8), San Luis Potosí (0.72), and Sinaloa (0.72). The Relatedness measures the distance between an industry and the current industrial composition in each state. The presented entities register a level of specialization lower than one unit (RCA <1).
Diversity
#permalink to sectionWorkforce by Schooling Years, Age Range and Gender
#permalink to sectionAverage Age 2024-Q3: N/A
Average Years of Schooling 2024-Q3: N/A
The visualization shows the workforce of Manufacturing by age group and years of schooling, comparing men and women.
* The visualization omits the range of schooling "Not Specified".
Staff According to Age of the Companies
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the percentage distribution of employed staff according to age range or educational level in economic units of different ages.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the economic units of the Manufacturing sector had N/A people employed, by age range N/A people up to 20 years old were registered, N/A people from 21 to 30 years old, N/A people from 31 to 40 years old and N/A people over 40 years old.
By educational level N/A people without education were registered, N/A people with basic education, N/A people with upper secondary education and N/A people with higher education.
Staff Turnover and Permanence
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the percentage distribution of staff turnover and permanence in companies of different sizes and ages, according to the option selected in the upper button.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, employee turnover is N/A.
Training
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the Economic Census 2019, the staff distribution who received training according to age range was 54.9% of staff with up to 20 years, 51.5% of staff between 21 and 30 years, 51.8% of staff between 31 and 40 years, and 48.4% of staff with 41 years or more.
According to the level of instruction, the distribution of trained staff was 40.1% of staff without intruction, 48.7% of staff with basic education, 52.9% of staff with upper secondary education, and 57.7% of staff with higher education.
Financing
#permalink to sectionAccess to Financing
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the Economic Census 2019, the distribution of economic units according to size that had access to financing was 8.34% units with up to 10 people, 28.1% units with 11 to 50 people, 42.9% units with 51 to 250 people, and 36.3% units with 251 and more people.
According to the age of the economic units, the distribution of those that obtained financing was 12.2% of the recently created (up to 2 years) units, 10.6% of the youth (3 to 5 years) units, 9.65% of the adults (6 to 10 years) units, and 8.83% of the seniors (over 10 years) units.
The states with the highest percentage of economic units that received financing were N/A.
Sources and Uses of Financing
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the percentage of economic units according to size or age according to the sources of financing or the uses they gave to the financing received.
In the chart, each level corresponds to a size or age of the company depending on the option selected in the upper button. The darker the box, the higher the percentage of economic units that are in that category.
Access to Bank Account and Credit
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the Economic Census 2019, the distribution of economic units that had a bank account was 10.8% units with up to 10 people, 74.6% units with 11 to 50 people, 93.5% units with 51 to 250 people, and 93.3% units with 251 and more people.
The states with the highest percentage of economic units that had a bank account were Nuevo León (47%), Baja California (42.2%), Chihuahua (37.3%), Baja California Sur (36%), and Querétaro (33.8%).
The same information can be viewed for the economic units that had bank credit by changing the option selected in the upper button.
Reasons for not Having Credit or Bank Account
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the percentage of economic units classified by size according to reasons for not having a bank account or credit.
In the chart, each level corresponds to a company size, the darker the box, the greater the percentage of economic units that are in that category. The categories represent the reasons why the companies did not have a bank account or credit, depending on the option selected in the upper button.
Information Technologies
#permalink to sectionAvailability of Internet Service and Computing
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the distribution of companies that had internet services or computer services according to the size or age of the economic units, depending on the options selected in the upper buttons.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the Manufacturing sector had 13.8% of economic units that had internet services and 14.9% of economic units that had computer services. The disaggregation by size or age of the units can be analyzed in the visualization.
Business Management
#permalink to sectionInternet Purchases and Sales
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the distribution of purchases and sales over the Internet and the distribution of monetary transactions according to the medium used in the transaction and the size of the companies.
According to data from the 2019 Economic Census, internet sales reached N/A and purchases were N/A. On the other hand, sales made in monetary transactions were N/A and purchases reached N/A.
Problems faced by economic units
#permalink to sectionThe chart shows the main problems faced by economic units. With the upper selector it is possible to analyze the problems affecting companies according to their size. By default, the problems of economic units with up to 10 people are shown.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the main problems faced by the economic units of Manufacturing with up to 10 workers are N/A.
Accounting System
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the Economic Census 2019, the distribution of economic units that had an accounting system was 42.4% units with up to 10 people, 93.5% units with 11 to 50 people, 98.9% units with 51 to 250 people, and 99.1% units with 251 and more people.
The states with the highest percentage of economic units that had an accounting system were Baja California (79.5%), Chihuahua (76.9%), Nuevo León (75.8%), Ciudad de México (71.3%), and Quintana Roo (71.2%).
Expenditure and Income Control Mechanisms
#permalink to sectionThe chart shows the percentage of companies by size that used different mechanisms to control expenses and income in their operations.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the main expenses and income control mechanisms were accounting system developed by third parties (58.6%) in companies with up to 10 people, external accounting system (45.3%) in companies with 11 to 50 people, internally developed accounting system (67.8%) in companies with 51 to 250 people, and internally developed accounting system (80.6%) in companies with 251 and more people.
Environment
#permalink to sectionEnvironmental Standard
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the percentage of large economic units of the private and parastatal sector that had activities in 2018, according to compliance with the environmental standard.
In 2018, 29.1% of the large economic units complied with the environmental standard, 31.3% did not know if they complied with any environmental standard, and 39.6% did not comply with the environmental standard.
Staff Engaged in Environmental Protection Activities
#permalink to sectionThe visualization shows the percentage distribution of economic units in the private and parastatal sectors of Manufacturing that had staff in environmental protection activities by state.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the states with the highest percentage of large economic units that had staff in environmental protection activities were Tamaulipas (46.2%), Chihuahua (44.3%), Tlaxcala (42.6%), Querétaro (40.4%), and Coahuila de Zaragoza (37.5%).
Environmental Protection Processes
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the 2019 Economic Census, 69.6% of the large economic units in the Manufacturing sector separated their waste, highlighting the separation of paper (87.8%), plastic (72.8%), and metal (62%).
On the other hand, 13.7% of the large economic units applied some treatment to the wastewater generated in their activity. The main uses of the treated water were discharge to the public network (4.74%), gardening and cleaning (3.99%), and same production process (3.83%).
Expenditure and Investment in Environmental Protection
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the Economic Census 2019, N/A% of the large economic units in the Manufacturing sector made expenditures on environmental protection, highlighting expenditures in N/A.
On the other hand, N/A% of the large economic units made investment in environmental protection. The main investments were in N/A.
Science, Innovation and Technology
#permalink to sectionInnovation in Large Companies in Recent Years
#permalink to sectionThe visualizations shows the percentage distribution of the large economic units of the private and parastatal sector of Manufacturing with innovation activities in at least one year between 2016 and 2018.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the states with the highest percentage of large economic units with innovation activities in 2016, 2017 or 2018 were Baja California Sur (31.1%), Campeche (23.6%), Tlaxcala (23.4%), Querétaro (23.3%), and Colima (21.2%).
Innovation Activities in 2018
#permalink to sectionAccording to data from the Economic Census 2019, 15.6% of the large economic units of the private and parastatal sector of Manufacturing had innovation activities in 2018.
Of the total staff employed in large economic units, 2.08% was employed in product innovation activities, 2.04% in process innovation, 0.51% in market innovation, 1.14% in organizational innovation, and 0.74% in innovation for technological adaptation and documentation.