ProceduresGovernment

Anthropologists, Archaeologists and Historians

Occupation (2131) - 2025-Q1

  • 7.24k, Workforce
  • $6.51k MX, Average monthly salary
  • 59.7, Average age
  • 29.2, Weekly hours worked
  • 4.41, Weekly days worked
  • 19.4%, Workforce with second job
  • 14.5%, Informal Workforce

About Anthropologists, Archaeologists and Historians

#permalink to section

The workforce of Anthropologists, Archaeologists and Historians during first quarter of 2025 was 7.24k people, whose salary averaged $6.51k MX working around 29.2 hours per week.

The average age of Anthropologists, Archaeologists and Historians was 59.7 years. The workforce was distributed in 30.8% men with an average salary of $1.44k MX and, 69.2% women with average salary of $8.77k MX.

The best average salaries received by Anthropologists, Archaeologists and Historians were in N/A while the workforce was larger in Ciudad de México (4.81k), Baja California (596), and Yucatán (552).

In terms of industries, the best average salaries were in Legal Services ($39.7k MX), General Public Administration ($16.5k MX), and Regulation and Promotion of Economic Developmen ($14.3k MX), while the workforce was concentrated on N/A.

Workforce and Salaries Evolution

#permalink to section

  • 7.24k, Workforce 2025-Q1
  • $6.51k MX, Average monthly salary 2025-Q1

At first quarter of 2025, the people who worked as Anthropologists, Archaeologists and Historians were 7.24k being a 3.15% higher than the fourth quarter of 2024. (7.02k).

In the same period, an average salary of $6.51k MX was observed, registering a drop of 30.2%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 ($9.33k MX).

Workforce by State

#permalink to section

The states with the highest number of Anthropologists, Archaeologists and Historians during the first quarter of 2025 were Ciudad de México (4.81k), Baja California (596), and Yucatán (552)

Comparing the first quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2025, the main positive variations occurred in Ciudad de México and Yucatán with an increase of 1.4k (41.2%) and 369 (202%), respectively. On the other hand, the negative variations were accentuated in Jalisco and Zacatecas with a decrease of 382 (46.8%) and 222 (64.7%), respectively.